Creating your own GPTs or Gems

ChatGPT with a paid account or Google Gemini with your ordinary free Google account let you create pre-prompted versions of their chatbots. I call these assistants. In the presentation "Making your own AI Assistants" I show how this is done. I have also created an assistant "GPT-helper" to help you with this. A useful work flow is to begin by discussing your idea for a new assistant with the GPT-helper (or any other chatbot). Once you have a clear idea of this assistant you enter as much as possible to the GPT-helper who will then guide you through the rest of the process. The GPT-helper will create three different suggestions for your assistant. The first is based on a strict framework, the second is more technical and the final one is more creative. It will then analyze all three suggestions for strengths and weaknesses and then merge them into a final suggestion, ready to be implemented by you. It will then suggest test questions and analyze the answers to help you with the testing phase. The presentation is stored in a dropbox folder: https://gpthb.se/riga The GPT-helper (as a custom GPT): https://gpthb.se/gpt The GPT-helper (as a Gemini Gem): https://gpthb.se/gptgem In the presentation we made a Cat assistant: https://gemini.google.com/gem/1PCrlboH36Wb8ZvZavRSV2AhMClXNS2p_?usp=sharing The first answer on machine learning from the Cat: Stretch... yawn... Prrr-p-purrr. Oh, hello there. You’ve caught me right in the middle of a very important sunbeam-alignment session. But I suppose I can spare a moment to talk about this "Machine Learning" thing you humans are so obsessed with. From my perspective—the only one that really matters, let’s be honest—Machine Learning is just a very fancy way of saying a computer is trying to act more like a cat. It’s all about pattern recognition. How it Works (The "Mouse-Catching" Method) You see, when I was a tiny kitten, I didn't know that a red dot on the floor was an uncatchable ghost. I had to learn through data.
  1. Input: I see a movement.
  2. Processing: My brain compares it to every other movement I've seen. Is it a bird? Is it a vacuum? (The vacuum is a hard "no.")
  3. Outcome: If I pounce and catch it, that’s a "True Positive." If I pounce and it’s just a shadow, that’s an "Error."
Machines do the same thing, but they use math instead of whiskers. They look at millions of pictures of, say, me, and eventually, the computer says, "Aha! Pointy ears plus fluff equals Cat." Types of Learning
  • Supervised Learning: This is like when you point at a bag of treats and say "Treats!" loudly. The machine has a human "master" telling it exactly what everything is. Meow-rk. A bit stifling, if you ask me. I prefer my independence.
  • Unsupervised Learning: This is more my style. It’s like when I explore a new cardboard box. I’m just looking for patterns and hidden structures without anyone telling me what to do. "Is this a bed? Is this a scratcher?" I decide.
  • Reinforcement Learning: This is how I trained you to feed me at 5:00 AM. I performed an action (screaming at your face), and I received a reward (kibble). The machine tries different things to maximize its "reward" score. Smart.
Why should I care?Honestly? I only care if it makes my life better.
  • Better Toasters: So my bread-smell stays consistent.
  • Smart Pet Doors: To keep that neighborhood stray, Buster, out of my bowl.
  • Automated Lasers: Although... the joy is in the hunt, not the algorithm.
Yawn. All this talk of logic is making me sleepy. If you want to know more about the math behind it, I might need a chin scratch first. It’s O(n)—that’s "Order of Naptime." Would you like me to explain how "Neural Networks" are actually just digital versions of my very sensitive hunting instincts? Purrrrrr.